Савостикова М. В., Федосеева Е. С., Фурминская Е. Ю., Горбань Н. А.

ФГБУ «Центральная клиническая больница с поликлиникой» Управления делами Президента Российской Федерации; Россия, 121359 Москва, ул. Маршала Тимошенко, 15

1. Bahrenberg L.P.H. On the diagnostic results of the microscopical examination of the ascitic fluid in two cases of carcinoma involving the peritoneum. Cleveland Med Gaz 1896;11:273–4.

2. Mandlebaum F.S. A case of actinomycosis. Proc New York Path Soc 1900;178–9.

3. Josefson A. Primär lungkancer med svulstceller I pleuraexsudat och sputum. Hygiea 1901;63:435–45.

4. Papanicolaou G.N. Atlas of Exfoliative Cytology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954.

5. Sattenspiel E. Cytological diagnosis of cancer in transudates and exudates; a comparison of the Papanicolaou method and the paraffin block technique. Surg Gynec Obst 1949;89:478–84.

6. Baganz H.M., Ehrich W.E. Cytological and chemical study of pleural fluid with special reference to the cell block technic. J Philadelphia Gen Hosp 1950;1:79–84.

7. Bothereau N.R. Use of paraffinembedding methods in the cytologic study of various bodily secretions. Am J Med 1950;8:733–7.

8. Chapman C.B., Whalen E.J. The examination of serous fluids by cell block technic. New England J Med 1947;237:215–20.

9. Goldman A. Value of cytological study of effusions. J Missouri MA 1929;26:593–6.

10. Hunter W.C., Richardson H.L. Cytologic recognition of cancer in exfoliated material from various sources; useful modifications of Papanicolaou techniques. Surg Gynec Obst 1947;85:275–80.

11. Lande K.E. Examination of effusions in tumor cases. J Lab Clin Med 1939;24:685–9.

12. Seecof D.P., Boetsch N. The value of examining body fluids for tumor cells. Proc New York Path Soc 1924;24:2–9.

13. Nithyananda A.N., Narayan E., Smith M.M., Horn J.M. Cell block cytology. Improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:599–606.

14. Luse S.A., Reagan J.W. A htistocytological study of effusions. II. Effusions associated with malignant tumors. Cancer 1954;7:1167–81.

15. Birge R.F., McMullen T., Davis S.K. A rapid method for paraffin section study of exfoliated neoplastic cells in bodily fluids. Am J Clin Path 1948;18:754.

16. Carson C.P., Valdes Dapena A. Coagulated plasma as an embedding medium in the cytologic study of body fluids. Am J Clin Path 1951;21:96–8.

17. Gold H., Carrie A. The detection of malignant cells in pleural and ascitic fluids. Canad MAJ 1950;62:84–5.

18. Luse S.A., Reagan J.W. A histocytological and electron microscopic study of effusions associated with malignant disease. Ann New York Acad Sci 1956;63:1331–47.

19. Venable D.R. Bronchogenic carcinoma; report of a case diagnosed from fixed frozen sections of sediment from pleural exudate. South MJ 1943;36:175–80.

20. Wihman G. Cytological findings in exudates and transudates. Acta Path Microbiol Scandinav 1948;25:87–97.

21. James W., Reagan M.D. Exfoliative cytology of pleural, peritoneal and pericardial fluids. CA Cancer J Clin 1960;10:153–9. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.10.5.153.

22. Kerstens H.M., Robben J.C., Poddighe P.J. et al. AgarCyto: a novel cell-processing method for multiple molecular diagnostic analyses of the uterine cervix. J Histochem Cytochem 2000;48(5):709–18. DOI: 10.1177/002215540004800515.

23. Волченко Н.Н., Борисова О.В., Баранова И.Б. Технология «клеточный блок» в цитологической практике. Клиническая лабораторная диагностика 2015;60(8):37–9. [Volchenko N.N., Borisova O.V., Baranova I. The technology “cell block” in cytological practice. Klinicheskaya Laboratornaya Diagnostika = Clinical Cell Diagnostics 2015;60(8):37–9. (In Russ.)].

24. Khan S., Omar T., Michelow P. Effectiveness of the cell block technique in diagnostic cytopathology. J Cytol 2012;29(3):177–82. DOI: 10.4103/0970-9371.101167.

25. Benkovich V., Cuda J., Khalbuss W. et al. Comparison of cell block preparation using HistoGel and plasma thrombin techniques. J Am Soc Cytopathology 2012;1(1 Suppl):S114–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2012.08.249.

26. Rekhtman N., Buonocore D.J., Rudomina D. et al. Novel modification of HistoGel-based cell block preparation method: improved sufficiency for molecular studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018;142(4):529–35. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0030-OA.

27. Ban Hemel B.M., Suurmeijer A.J. Effective application of the methanolbased PreservCyt™ fixative and the Cellient ™ automated cell block processor to diagnostic cytopathology, immunocytochemistry, and molecular biology. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41(8):734–41. DOI: 10.1002/dc.22963.

28. Kruger A.M., Stevens M.W., Kerley K.J., Carter C.D. Comparison of the Cellient™ automated cell block system and agar cell block method. Cytopathology 2014;25(6):381–8. DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12216.

29. Xing W., Hou A.Y., Fischer A. et al. The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests. Cancer Cytopathol 2014;122(1):8–14. DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21343.

30. Mathew E.P., Nair V. Role of cell block in cytopathologic evaluation of imageguided fine needle aspiration cytology. J Cytol 2017;34(3):133–8.

31. Shivakumarswamy U., Arakeri S.U., Karigowdar M.H., Yelikar B. Diagnostic utility of the cell block method versus the conventional smear study in pleural fluid cytology. J Cytol 2012;29(1):11–5.

32. Matreja S.S., Malukani K., Nandedkar S.S. et al. Comparison of efficacy of cell block versus conventional smear study in exudative fluids. Niger Postgrad Med J 2017;24(4):245–9.